Not in my name.
As Stonewall propose the indoctrination of 2 years olds, It's time for homosexuals to say "Enough".
Homosexuals face a choice. That choice is to fall in with the sinister ex-gay charity Stonewall which finally crossed the credibility Rubicon this week with a tweet urging the indoctrination of toddlers into gender ideology, or to stand up, oppose this madness and say “not in my name”. Silence is not an option, those evading this issue for a quiet life will be taken to have been complicit by the army of actual homophobes now headed in our direction. Stonewall claims to speak for us and our opponents will take it at its word when the reckoning comes. Such is their abuse and exploitation of our cause, our lives, our movement that we are now in reality left with no choice in the matter, we must say something to bring an end to this wicked cult.
I needn’t point out of course that your average two-year-old has a basic command of language. I needn’t point out few are toilet trained. I needn’t point out they have vivid imaginations and are just as likely to tell you they are superman or a tractor as they are a member of the opposite sex. I needn’t say such thing because such things are painfully obvious to anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of age-appropriate education. Such things are obvious to anyone with a passing familiarity for safeguarding. Such things are obvious because to anyone who has met a two-year-old. Such things are obvious because they are quite obvious.
Not it would seem to the privileged class of charity-sector gender aristocrats who now function as a shadow government worming their way into every institution they can teaching this gutter-cult like bilge entirely disconnected from material reality. Their objective is an obvious one, to spread their sinister new religion as far as possible by stealth, to exercise undemocratic control over public institutions like schools, to create a McCarthyite culture which harasses and cancels dissenters, to fill people’s minds full of rot and poison and to persecute any who dare question them as if they were heretics.
No.
That means no.
We are long passed the point where any homosexual has a plausible excuse not to metaphorically take up arms against this this. I say this to my fellow homosexuals. Gender ideology teaches that boys and girls playing with toys typical for the opposite gender (as many of us who grow up to be gay did) are born wrong and into the wrong bodies. In so doing it locates the misery and challenges of not fitting in socially within the homosexual body. It says not that society should change and accept different kids or different people, but that the gender non-conforming homosexual must hate their body and change it by medicine to fit in with gender stereotypes we thought we had defeated in the 90s.
It now wants to teach this to two years olds. Two. It wants there to be no escape from the cult of gender, not in Universities, hospitals, schools, government departments, now it wants to extend it’s malign and greedy reach to nurseries and kindergartens. It wants a gender non-conforming homosexual at every point to meet with the catechism that their bodies are wrong and must be changed. If homosexuals were an ethnic group, we would call this philosophy genocidal. It has never taken detransition seriously, and ignores homosexuals who cite internalised homophobia as a cause for their medical pathway.
To any wavering homosexual, I beg you look closely at what is really happening here with this cult-like philosophy. Look how the gender borg practice and encourage woke gay conversion therapy. Look at their contempt for lesbians who dare oppose them. Look at how this belief system pretends to be gay rights 2.0 but is in reality fundamentally homophobic, misogynist and racist. Look at the contempt it has for homosexuals drawing a line and observing same-sex sexual boundaries. Look at the appalling, incoherent, bourgeois mess Pride now represents. Ask yourself if you are happy with Lesbians being called “sexual racists”, or if you’re happy being called a “genital fetishist”, ask yourself if you’re happy with the promotion of gay men as figures of fun a la the 1970s. Ask yourself if you’re content for two-year-olds to be told their bodies are wrong.
In the chaos of gender there is always symmetry. This week Reddit and Twitter banned the use of the word “groomer” just as Stonewall tweet about 2-year-olds being indoctrinated, (I prefer the latter word myself but indoctrination is a form of psychological/religious grooming). This week YouGov released data showing the British public have had enough of the excesses of biology denial just as Stonewall with this tweet seem take the view it needs yet more. This week government departments by the handful flee the madness of Stonewall just as it makes a tone-deaf plea for more influence in schools.
We see here a sinister and malign force that has now severed what few ties it had with reality, with polity, with common sense, with speaking for any constituency other than extreme gender ideologues. This outfit is now in orbit and is no longer responding to reality. It is badly out of control and has shown it cannot be trusted to occupy any serious place in public life. It seeks to corrupt the curriculum and to teach children a religious belief they have the wrong body and to make them reliant on its new cult-like teachings.
To homosexuals I say this. This could have been you. This could have been you age two onwards taught your body was wrong. Imagine that. On top of all the feeling of not fitting in and being morally wrong and different. This could have been directed at you from the age you were a toddler. This could have been augmented at school then repeated at university. This is not “being kind”. This is not gay rights. This is a new religion and the new clerical class mean for there to be no escape from it.
Why us you ask? Why must we always fight? First section 28, then AIDS, then battle after battle after battle. The reason is this. This corrupted and exploited our movement. It is coming from our movement now. It pretends to be our movement. Straight people are afraid to challenge it because they are labelled homophobic. We are uniquely placed to fight this. These people claim to speak in our name, that is their power, so….
It's time to say enough.
It’s time to stand up.
It’s time to point out gay people oppose this.
It’s time to end this madness.
It’s time to say “Not in my name”.
(Update: Should you wish to, I urge any homosexuals with twitter accounts to quote tweet Stonewall and simply say “Not in my name” (or similar) #Notinmyname)
Many of us have stories of being 'gender non-conforming' as a child .... including myself.
Luckily my parents found it funny when I was given both sparkly high heels and a cheap version of 'action man' when I won a fancy dress contest dressed as a male hero age 10-ish because they (the judges) couldnt work out if I was a boy or a girl. And my parents weren't even 'progressive' in any other way! Certainly not politically.
My parents and I never questioned that this was ok - that a girl could emulate a male hero or a female hero. That a boy could be as affectionate as a girl etc. That I could play football with my brothers' friends and that didn't mean anything regarding my future sexuality or 'gender identity'. We all knew I was a girl.
This was pre-Stonewall. Nowadays I dread to think what could have happened. Stonewall is such a regressive dangerous organisation and no-one voted for em to start influencing children. There is no evidence for their 'gender ideological' [anti-logical?] claims and no authority to do this - yet here we are.
Thanks for this Dennis - I think we need a campaign to our MP's in the name of free speech and representative democracy - whichever party, this harmful 'intellectual' nonsense has no basis on what we know about child development and no right to power AT ALL.
Surely this goes beyond the charitable aims of Stonewall as lodged with the Commission. How about we bombard the Charity Commission with complaints? Please can we have a post to organise us on this.